INDEXTRACK: STRATEGYTRACK: CREATIVE

Subject ID

M05-M5_

UNCLASSIFIED
Module 05

M5 L1 Project Brief

Project Brief: The Digital Detox Redesign

Module: 5: The Human Element: Designing Responsible, Ethical, and Collaborative AI Lesson: 1: Beyond the Interface: Engineering Calm and Trustworthy AI


1. Objective

Your objective is to apply the principles of Calm Technology to a real-world digital product. You will select a notoriously "noisy" or attention-draining application and re-architect its user experience to be calmer, less intrusive, and more respectful of the user's attention. This project will test your ability to critique existing design patterns and propose thoughtful, human-centric alternatives.


2. The Mission

Imagine you are a UX consultant who has been hired by a major tech company (e.g., Meta, X/Twitter, or a major news organization). The company has started to receive negative feedback about the mental health impact of its product. Users are complaining of feeling anxious, distracted, and overwhelmed.

Your mission is to conduct a "Calm Technology Audit" of their flagship app and present a compelling redesign proposal that demonstrates how the product can achieve its core business goals with less cognitive load on the user. You are to act as the conscience of the company, advocating for a more humane design.


3. Your Task

You will choose one of the following notoriously "noisy" applications:

  • The Instagram Feed
  • The X (formerly Twitter) Feed
  • The main screen of a major news app (e.g., CNN, BBC News, The New York Times)

Your task is to create a "before-and-after" redesign proposal that illustrates how you would transform the user experience based on the principles of Calm Technology.

Your workflow should be:

  1. Audit the Existing Design: Analyze the current design of your chosen app. Identify the specific design patterns that create noise and demand attention (e.g., infinite scroll, auto-playing videos, red notification badges, sensationalist headlines).
  2. Define the Core "Job-to-be-Done": What is the fundamental, legitimate job that a user hires this app to do? (e.g., for Instagram: "Connect with the lives of my friends," for a news app: "Stay informed about the most important events of the day").
  3. Ideate Calm Alternatives: For each "noisy" pattern you identified, brainstorm an alternative design that is calmer and more respectful. How can the app deliver on its core job without demanding the user's constant attention?
  4. Create the Redesign: Create a high-fidelity mockup of your redesigned screen.
  5. Present Your Case: Compile your audit and your redesign into a persuasive presentation.

4. Key Requirements

Your redesign proposal must include the following sections:

  1. The Problem: A "Noise" Audit

    • A screenshot of the app's current design, with annotations pointing out at least three specific design patterns that violate the principles of Calm Technology. Ensure these screenshots are clear and high-resolution.
    • For each pattern, write a brief explanation of why it is "noisy" and what negative effect it has on the user.
  2. The Vision: A Calmer Alternative

    • A high-fidelity mockup of your redesigned screen.
    • This is not just about making the UI minimalist; it is about fundamentally rethinking the interactions. Your redesign should be a tangible representation of a more humane approach.
  3. The Redesign Rationale (The "Before-and-After")

    • This is the core of your project. You must present a side-by-side comparison of your design choices.
    • For each of the three "noisy" patterns you identified in the audit, you must:
      • Show the "before" (the old design pattern). Ensure clear visual representation.
      • Show the "after" (your new, calmer design pattern). Ensure clear visual representation.
      • Write a clear, concise rationale that explains why your new design is better, referencing specific principles of Calm Technology.
  4. The Business Case for Calm

    • A concluding paragraph that addresses the likely stakeholder objection: "But won't this decrease our engagement metrics?" You must make a compelling argument for why a calmer, more respectful design will lead to greater long-term user trust, loyalty, and ultimately, business value.

5. Format and Deliverable

  • Format: A single, well-structured Markdown document.
  • Length: Approximately 800-1200 words, plus images.
  • Deliverable: A .md file named Digital_Detox_Redesign.md.

7. Tips for Success

  • Focus on the "Job-to-be-Done": Clearly define the core purpose of the app. Your redesign should still enable users to achieve this purpose, but in a calmer way.
  • Be Specific in Your Critique: Don't just say "too many notifications." Explain why a specific notification pattern is noisy and how it violates Calm Technology principles.
  • Visuals are Crucial: Your "before-and-after" screenshots are key. Ensure they clearly illustrate the problem and your proposed solution. Use annotations effectively.
  • Anticipate Objections: Think like a business leader. How would you respond to concerns about reduced engagement metrics? Frame your arguments in terms of long-term value and user trust.

6. Evaluation Criteria

Your proposal will be evaluated on the following criteria:

  • Depth of Critique (40%):
    • How insightful is your audit of the existing design?
    • Do you correctly identify at least three specific design patterns that create "noise" and explain their negative impact on the user?
    • Does your critique demonstrate a clear understanding of Calm Technology principles?
  • Quality of Redesign (40%):
    • How creative and effective is your redesigned mockup?
    • Does it successfully translate the principles of Calm Technology into a tangible and compelling user interface?
    • Does the redesign effectively achieve the app's core "Job-to-be-Done" with less cognitive load?
  • Strength of Argument (20%):
    • How persuasive is your rationale for your design choices?
    • Does your conclusion make a strong, data-backed business case for a calmer approach, addressing potential objections?
    • Is the proposal clear, concise, and professional in tone?

END OF TRANSMISSION

CONFIDENTIAL